Analysing Movement Workshop 2018, Paris, France

26. - 27. March 2018 at IRCAM in Paris

Organized by IRCAM's ISMM team

The workshop was again a meeting of a group of researchers and artists collaborating on the topic of movement analysis/interpretation using technological and conceptual approaches. The overall goal was to exchange on current research activities and extend the circle of researchers.

spaces

Participants:

  • IRCAM: Frederic Bevilacqua, Hugo Scurto
  • ICST: Jan Schacher, Daniel Bisig
  • Motion Bank: Scott DeLahunta, David Rittershaus
  • Little Hear Movement: Anne Dubos, Hortense Kack
  • Bertha Bermudez (independent researcher)
  • LRI: Sarah Fdili Alaoui
  • IRI: Baptiste Caramiaux
  • LMSI: Jules Françoise

Schedule

Monday 26.3.

14:00 - 15:30

Session A: 90 minutes

recapping the September meeting / feedback
getting up-to-date with everybody's activities
16:00 - 17:30

Session B: 90 minutes

Monday Night Dinner

Tuesday 27.3.

10:00 - 11:30

Session C: 90 minutes

mapping the research field :: in groups of 2/3, make
mapping the research needs
developing collaboration strategies
11:45 - 13:00

Session D: 75 minutes

Lunch

14:00 - 15::30

Session E: 90 minutes

common writings/other outputs
mutual research activities
16:00-17:30

Session F: 90 minutes

Meeting notes.

Motivations, interests

  • Anne: understanding, epistemological question, 'emic vs. etic (de Sardan)' POV, map of points of view, phenomenological body to trans-media object, perceptive representation of cognition

  • Baptiste: dialogue in a wider circle, variability in methodologies, use network to share / facilitate mobility/ exchange/ collaboration resource sharing

  • Bertha: appreciation, sharing, shape encounters, freedom to decide on formats

  • Daniel: collaboration, low effort level, coordination, (not necessarily immediately grants)

  • Fred: functioning group in a simple way, many commonalities, naturally existing network, fragile, not standard academic format, sustaining and supportive, stimulating

  • Hortense: more in the action & practise, applying techniques, experimentation, sharing sketches

  • Jan; collective thinking, relations to own activities and affinities, like minded groups, finding the "big" questions, engage in other forms of encounters

  • Hugo: provide vision on methods and approaches, discussions about reasons for research & context

  • Sarah: natural sharing, common obsessions, common interests, common questions, different objects, methodologies, authentic openness, free of tasks

  • Scott: sharing work about annotation, strategic connections, overlap, focused lines of inquiry
spaces